Answer Question
I used to have a Fidelity-something years ago, but I got bored with it- either I set it (for example) to Level 6.
And beat it about 90% of the time, or I'd set it to Level 7 and lose 100% of the time.
Do these higher-end DGT electronic boards offer the "playability" akin to the Centaur's touted strength - its' ability to 'adjust' play so that the winning probability at each level is a little less predictable? (That is to say, is there an algorithm built in that makes winning chances more even [than 90% win @Level "6" vs 100% lose @ Level "7"]? )
Is the software's end game as strong as its' opening and middle game? (In the "old days" the electronic chess games' weakness was their end game programming.)
Thank you. This chess board is designed for quality and enjoyable play.
Do these higher-end DGT electronic boards offer the "playability" akin to the Centaur's touted strength - its' ability to 'adjust' play so that the winning probability at each level is a little less predictable? (That is to say, is there an algorithm built in that makes winning chances more even [than 90% win @Level "6" vs 100% lose @ Level "7"]? )
Is the software's end game as strong as its' opening and middle game? (In the "old days" the electronic chess games' weakness was their end game programming.)
Thank you. This chess board is designed for quality and enjoyable play.
